United States v. Bridges
This text of United States v. Bridges (United States v. Bridges) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-8266
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JASON F. BRIDGES,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, District Judge. (1:05-cr-00080-IMK-JSK-1)
Submitted: May 21, 2009 Decided: May 27, 2009
Before MOTZ, TRAXLER, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jason F. Bridges, Appellant Pro Se. Shawn Angus Morgan, Assistant United States Attorney, Clarksburg, West Virginia; Thomas Oliver Mucklow, Assistant United States Attorney, Martinsburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Jason F. Bridges appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C.
§ 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. United States v. Bridges, No.
1:05-cr-00080-IMK-JSK-1 (N.D.W. Va. Oct. 15, 2008). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Bridges, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-bridges-ca4-2009.