United States v. Brian Hill
Opinion
USCA4 Appeal: 22-6501 Doc: 9 Filed: 08/23/2022 Pg: 1 of 3
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 22-6325
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
BRIAN DAVID HILL,
Defendant - Appellant.
No. 22-6501
Appeals from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Thomas D. Schroeder, Chief District Judge. (1:13-cr-00435-TDS-1; 1:22- cv-00074-TDS-JLW)
Submitted: August 18, 2022 Decided: August 23, 2022 USCA4 Appeal: 22-6501 Doc: 9 Filed: 08/23/2022 Pg: 2 of 3
Before WYNN, THACKER, and HEYTENS, Circuit Judges.
Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Brian David Hill, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
2 USCA4 Appeal: 22-6501 Doc: 9 Filed: 08/23/2022 Pg: 3 of 3
PER CURIAM:
Brian David Hill seeks to appeal the district court’s orders denying his motions for
appointment of a special master and appointment of counsel, his motion to reconsider, and
his motion to extend time for the Government to respond to his 28 U.S.C. § 2255 motion.
This court may exercise jurisdiction only over final orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1291, and certain
interlocutory and collateral orders, 28 U.S.C. § 1292; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Cohen v.
Beneficial Indus. Loan Corp., 337 U.S. 541, 545-46 (1949). The orders Hill seeks to appeal
are neither final orders nor appealable interlocutory or collateral orders. Accordingly, we
dismiss the appeals for lack of jurisdiction. We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
DISMISSED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Brian Hill (United States v. Brian Hill) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.