United States v. Brian Hill
This text of United States v. Brian Hill (United States v. Brian Hill) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 19-7483
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
BRIAN DAVID HILL,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Greensboro. Thomas D. Schroeder, Chief District Judge. (1:13-cr-00435-TDS-1)
Submitted: March 12, 2020 Decided: March 17, 2020
Before KING, KEENAN, and FLOYD, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Brian David Hill, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Brian David Hill appeals the district court’s order denying his pro se motion to stay
the judgment pending appeal and his pro se motion for recusal related to revocation of
supervised release proceedings. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error.
Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Hill,
No. 1:13-cr-00435-TDS-1 (M.D.N.C. Oct. 4, 2019). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Brian Hill, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-brian-hill-ca4-2020.