United States v. Brian Blurton
This text of 623 F. App'x 318 (United States v. Brian Blurton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
MEMORANDUM *
The district court erred by ordering restitution without disaggregating “the losses, *319 including ongoing losses, caused by the original abuse of [each] victim ... from the losses caused by the ongoing distribution and possession of images of that original abuse, to the extent possible.” United States v. Galan, No. 14-30145, 804 F.3d 1287, 1291, 2015 WL 6736535 (9th Cir. Nov. 4, 2015).
The restitution order is VACATED and the case is REMANDED for further proceedings consistent with Galan.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
623 F. App'x 318, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-brian-blurton-ca9-2015.