United States v. Brewbaker

89 F. App'x 419
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 16, 2004·No. No. 03-6028·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In these consolidated appeals, Douglas Hayth Brewbaker seeks to appeal the district court’s orders and judgment denying relief on his motion filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000). An appeal may not be taken from the final order in a § 2255 proceeding unless a circuit justice or judge issues a certificate of appealability. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(1) (2000). A certificate of appealability will not issue for claims addressed by the district court on the merits absent “a substantial showing of the denial of a constitutional right.” 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2) (2000). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude that Brewbaker has not made the requisite showing. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before [420] the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Brewbaker, 89 F. App'x 419 (4th Cir. 2004).

89 F. App'x 419 (United States v. Brewbaker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Brewbaker v. United States
543 U.S. 849 (Supreme Court, 2004)