United States v. Breton-Pichardo

616 F. App'x 636
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedSeptember 30, 2015
DocketNo. 15-7061
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 616 F. App'x 636 (United States v. Breton-Pichardo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Breton-Pichardo, 616 F. App'x 636 (4th Cir. 2015).

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Jose Breton-Pichardo appeals the district court’s orders denying his motion for reduction of sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Breton-Pichardo, No. 5:03-cr-70006-SGW-9 (W-D.Va. May 28, 2015; June 24, 2015). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
616 F. App'x 636, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-breton-pichardo-ca4-2015.