United States v. Breton-Pichardo

304 F. App'x 211

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Jose Breton-Pichardo appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to reduce his sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Breton-Pichardo, No. 5:03-cr-70006-sgw-9 (W.D.Va. Aug. 27, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.