United States v. Breton-Pichardo
This text of United States v. Breton-Pichardo (United States v. Breton-Pichardo) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-7938
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
JOSE BRETON-PICHARDO, a/k/a Rolando Berberena,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Virginia, at Harrisonburg. Samuel G. Wilson, District Judge. (5:03-cr-70006-sgw-9)
Submitted: December 16, 2008 Decided: December 29, 2008
Before WILKINSON, MICHAEL, and KING, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Jose Breton-Pichardo, Appellant Pro Se. Jeb Thomas Terrien, Assistant United States Attorney, Harrisonburg, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Jose Breton-Pichardo appeals the district court’s
order denying his motion to reduce his sentence pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and
find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the
reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Breton-
Pichardo, No. 5:03-cr-70006-sgw-9 (W.D. Va. Aug. 27, 2008). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Breton-Pichardo, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-breton-pichardo-ca4-2008.