United States v. Brantley

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: October 22, 2009
• Docket: 09-7514
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7514

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

EDWARD MILLER BRANTLEY, JR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Terrence W. Boyle, District Judge. (5:07-cr-00020-BO-1)

Submitted: October 15, 2009 Decided: October 22, 2009

Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Edward Miller Brantley, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Anne Margaret Hayes, Rudolf A. Renfer, Jr., Assistant United States Attorneys, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Edward Miller Brantley, Jr., appeals the district

court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion

for a sentence reduction. We have reviewed the record and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court. United States v. Brantley, No.

5:07-cr-00020-BO-1 (E.D.N.C. July 29, 2009). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED