United States v. Brannic

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Brannic

357 F. App'x 236

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

DecidedDecember 17, 2009

DocketNo. 09-10539

StatusPublished

This text of 357 F. App'x 236 (United States v. Brannic) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Brannic, 357 F. App'x 236 (11th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

James Wesley Smith III, appointed counsel for Larry Brannic, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s denial [237]*237of Brannic’s 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

James Wesley Smith III, appointed counsel for Larry Brannic, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s denial [237]*237of Brannic’s 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion is AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

357 F. App'x 236, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-brannic-ca11-2009.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack