United States v. Brannic

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Brannic

357 F. App'x 236

Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit·Decided December 17, 2009·No. No. 09-10539·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

James Wesley Smith III, appointed counsel for Larry Brannic, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s denial [237] of Brannic’s 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion is AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

James Wesley Smith III, appointed counsel for Larry Brannic, has filed a motion to withdraw on appeal pursuant to Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S.Ct. 1396, 18 L.Ed.2d 493 (1967). Because independent examination of the entire record reveals no arguable issues of merit, counsel’s motion to withdraw is GRANTED, and the district court’s denial [237] of Brannic’s 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion is AFFIRMED.

United States v. Brannic, 357 F. App'x 236 (11th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

357 F. App'x 236 (United States v. Brannic) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related