United States v. Brandon Singleton

Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·Decided June 11, 2009·No. 07-3399·Unpublished

Opinion

NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION To be cited only in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1

United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604

June 11, 2009

Before

FRANK H. EASTERBROOK, Chief Judge

DIANE P. WOOD, Circuit Judge

ANN CLAIRE WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge

No. 07‐3399

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appeal from the United States District Plaintiff‐Appellee, Court for the Southern District of Illinois.

v. No. 07 CR 30030

BRANDON L. SINGLETON, Michael J. Reagan, Defendant‐Appellant. Judge.

O R D E R

On November 24, 2008, we issued a limited remand under United States v. Taylor, 520 F.3d 746 (7th Cir. 2008), asking the district court to inform us whether it wished to resentence Brandon Singleton in light of Kimbrough v. United States, 552 U.S. 85 (2007). See United States v. Singleton, 548 F.3d 589 (7th Cir. 2008). The district court has now advised us that it is inclined to resentence Singleton. Therefore, we VACATE Singleton’s sentence and REMAND for resentencing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Brandon Singleton, (7th Cir. 2009).

United States v. Brandon Singleton (United States v. Brandon Singleton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Kimbrough v. United States
552 U.S. 85 (Supreme Court, 2007)
United States v. Taylor
520 F.3d 746 (Seventh Circuit, 2008)
United States v. Singleton
548 F.3d 589 (Seventh Circuit, 2008)