United States v. Boynton
This text of United States v. Boynton (United States v. Boynton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-8322
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DAVID BOYNTON,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. James R. Spencer, Chief District Judge. (3:97-cr-00294-JRS-1)
Submitted: February 19, 2009 Decided: February 26, 2009
Before WILKINSON, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Michael S. Nachmanoff, Federal Public Defender, Amy Leigh Austin, OFFICE OF THE FEDERAL PUBLIC DEFENDER, Assistant Federal Public Defender, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellant. Richard Daniel Cooke, Norval George Metcalf, Assistant United States Attorneys, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
David Boynton appeals the district court’s order
denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18
U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. United States v.
Boynton, No. 3:97-cr-00294-JRS-1 (E.D. Va. Oct. 14, 2008). See
United States v. Dunphy, 551 F.3d 247 (4th Cir. 2009). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Boynton, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-boynton-ca4-2009.