United States v. Boyce
36 F. App'x 612
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided June 12, 2002·No. No. 01-55410; D.C. No. CV-99-0003 MJL (LSP)·Published·Cited by 7 cases
Opinion
MEMORANDUM
Husband and wife James and Shelley Boyce (“the Boyces”) appeal the district court’s order reducing to judgment the Boyces’ unpaid tax assessments. The Boyces claim the district court erroneously applied res judicata (claim preclusion) to a tax court judgment determining the Boyces’ tax liabilities and erroneously determined on summary judgment the amount of tax liability to be reduced to judgment. We affirm for the reasons stated by the district court judges in their thorough and well-reasoned written orders.
AFFIRMED.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Boyce, 36 F. App'x 612 (9th Cir. 2002).
36 F. App'x 612 (United States v. Boyce) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Untitled Case
S.D. California, 2026
Hernandez v. Vesme, Corp
N.D. California, 2024
Doe v. Boys and Girls Clubs of Southern Nevada
D. Nevada, 2023
Harris v. Diamond Dolls of Nevada, LLC
D. Nevada, 2023
De Souza v. Dawson Technical, Inc.
S.D. California, 2022
Brugnara Properties VI v. Internal Revenue Service
N.D. California, 2019