United States v. Boyce

36 F. App'x 612
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided June 12, 2002·No. No. 01-55410; D.C. No. CV-99-0003 MJL (LSP)·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

MEMORANDUM***

Husband and wife James and Shelley Boyce (“the Boyces”) appeal the district court’s order reducing to judgment the Boyces’ unpaid tax assessments. The Boyces claim the district court erroneously applied res judicata (claim preclusion) to a tax court judgment determining the Boyces’ tax liabilities and erroneously determined on summary judgment the amount of tax liability to be reduced to judgment. We affirm for the reasons stated by the district court judges in their thorough and well-reasoned written orders.

AFFIRMED.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Boyce, 36 F. App'x 612 (9th Cir. 2002).

36 F. App'x 612 (United States v. Boyce) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related