United States v. Boston

62 F. App'x 460
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 27, 2003·No. No. 02-7901·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Willie L. Boston, III, seeks to appeal the district court’s May 31, 2002, order and judgment accepting the magistrate judge’s May 2, 2001, report and recommendation and denying relief on Boston’s 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (2000) motion, and the district court’s October 21, 2002, order denying Boston’s motion for reconsideration and non-publication. We have independently reviewed the record and cannot conclude that reasonable jurists would find the district court’s rulings debatable. Accordingly, we grant Boston’s pending motion for non-publication of this Court’s opinion, deny a certificate of appealability, and dismiss the appeal. 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000); Miller El v. Cockrell, — U.S. -, 123 S.Ct. 1029, 1039, 154 L.Ed.2d 931 (2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid in the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Boston, 62 F. App'x 460 (4th Cir. 2003).

62 F. App'x 460 (United States v. Boston) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Miller-El v. Cockrell
537 U.S. 322 (Supreme Court, 2003)