United States v. Boone

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6380

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

REGINALD BOONE, a/k/a Reggie,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Henry Coke Morgan, Jr., Senior District Judge. (2:92-cr-00113-002)

Submitted: August 26, 2010 Decided: September 1, 2010

Before KING and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Reginald Boone, Appellant Pro Se. Laura Marie Everhart, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Reginald Boone appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion for a reduction of sentence filed pursuant to

18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and

hold the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying

the motion. See United States v. Stewart, 595 F.3d 197, 200

(4th Cir. 2010). Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s

order for the reasons stated there. See United States v. Boone,

No. 2:92-cr-00113-002 (E.D. Va. Feb. 18, 2010). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED