United States v. Booker

382 F. App'x 267
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 9, 2010·No. No. 08-8494·Published

Opinion

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Ernest M. Booker appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion for reduction of sentence. We have reviewed the record and conclude that the appeal is moot because Booker is no longer in custody. See U.S. Sentencing Guidelines Manual § 1B1.10(b)(2)(C), p.s. (2009); Incumaa v. Ozmint, 507 F.3d 281, 285-86 (4th Cir.2007) (setting forth the principles of appellate mootness). We therefore dismiss the appeal as moot and deny Booker’s motion to appoint counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Booker, 382 F. App'x 267 (4th Cir. 2010).

382 F. App'x 267 (United States v. Booker) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Tyrone Davis
Fourth Circuit, 2026