United States v. Bonneau

481 F. App'x 398

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

In Appeal No. 12-35298, Ryan Frank Bonneau’s request for a certificate of ap-pealability is denied. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2). All pending motions in that case, if any, are denied as moot.

In Appeal No. 11-30269, Bonneau appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion for return of property. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. Because Bonneau’s criminal proceedings have ended, we remand to the district court to determine what, if any, property Bonneau is entitled to have returned to him. See Fed.R.Crim.P. 41(g); United States v. Kaczynski, 416 F.3d 971, 974 (9th Cir.2005).

In Appeal No. 12-35298 the request for a certificate of appealability is DENIED, and in Appeal No. 11-30269 the district court’s order is VACATED and the case is REMANDED.

Footnotes

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.