United States v. Boisseau

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: May 26, 2009
• Docket: 08-8510
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-8510

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

HOWARD O. BOISSEAU, III,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Robert E. Payne, Senior District Judge. (3:00-cr-00245-REP-1)

Submitted: May 7, 2009 Decided: May 26, 2009

Before MOTZ and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Howard O. Boisseau, III, Appellant Pro Se. Stephen Wiley Miller, Assistant United States Attorney, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Howard O. Boisseau, III, appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion for a sentence reduction pursuant to 18

U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. United States v.

Boisseau, No. 3:00-cr-00245-REP-1 (E.D. Va. Nov. 12, 2008). We

also deny Boisseau’s motion for appointment of counsel and

dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid in the decisional process.

AFFIRMED