United States v. Bobby Springston

534 F. App'x 576
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
DecidedOctober 16, 2013
Docket13-1624
StatusUnpublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 534 F. App'x 576 (United States v. Bobby Springston) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Bobby Springston, 534 F. App'x 576 (8th Cir. 2013).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

In 2009, Bobby Lynn Springston was charged with violating 18 U.S.C. § 2250 by failing to register as a sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender Registration and Notification Act (SORNA). Springston moved to dismiss the indictment arguing that SORNA violated the non-delegation doctrine. The district court 1 denied the motion. Springston appealed. This court affirmed the conviction. United States v. Springston, 650 F.3d 1153, 1157 (8th Cir.2011). The decision in Reynolds v. United States, - U.S. -, 132 S.Ct. 975, 984, 181 L.Ed.2d 935 (2012) necessitated a remand for consideration of the non-delegation issue. United States v. Springston, 480 Fed.Appx. 860, 861 (8th Cir.2012). The district court denied the motion to dismiss, upholding SORNA’s constitutionality.

On appeal, Springston again asserts that 42 U.S.C. § 16913(d) violates the non-delegation doctrine. While this appeal was pending, this court upheld the delegation in 42 U.S.C. § 16913(d) because Congress set forth an intelligible principle guiding the Attorney General’s exercise of authority. United States v. Kuehl, 706 F.3d 917, 920 (8th Cir.2013). See Mistretta v. United States, 488 U.S. 361, 372, 109 S.Ct. 647, 102 L.Ed.2d 714 (1989) (Congress may delegate legislative authority to another body, provided a legislative act sets an intelligible principle for the exercise of the granted authority to which the authorized body must conform). The Kuehl case resolves Springston’s appeal.

The judgment of the district court is affirmed.

1

. The Honorable Jimm Larry Hendren, United States District Judge for the Western District of Arkansas.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Bryan Huntley
594 F. App'x 108 (Fourth Circuit, 2014)
Springston v. United States
134 S. Ct. 1345 (Supreme Court, 2014)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
534 F. App'x 576, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-bobby-springston-ca8-2013.