United States v. Blue

671 F. App'x 59
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedNovember 28, 2016
DocketNo. 16-6916
StatusPublished

This text of 671 F. App'x 59 (United States v. Blue) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Blue, 671 F. App'x 59 (4th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

Unpubhshed opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kendall Ladell Blue appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion, in which Blue sought a reduction of his 252-month sentence based on Amendment 782 of the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See United States v. Mann, 709 F.3d 301, 304 (4th Cir. 2013) (reviewing district court’s decision under § 3583(c)(2) for abuse of discretion). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Blue, No. 7:11-cr-00135-D-l (E.D.N.C. June 13, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Robert Mann
709 F.3d 301 (Fourth Circuit, 2013)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
671 F. App'x 59, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-blue-ca4-2016.