United States v. Blue

671 F. App'x 59
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 28, 2016·No. No. 16-6916·Published

Opinion

Unpubhshed opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Kendall Ladell Blue appeals the district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion, in which Blue sought a reduction of his 252-month sentence based on Amendment 782 of the U.S. Sentencing Guidelines. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See United States v. Mann, 709 F.3d 301, 304 (4th Cir. 2013) (reviewing district court’s decision under § 3583(c)(2) for abuse of discretion). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Blue, No. 7:11-cr-00135-D-l (E.D.N.C. June 13, 2016). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Blue, 671 F. App'x 59 (4th Cir. 2016).

671 F. App'x 59 (United States v. Blue) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Robert Mann
709 F.3d 301 (Fourth Circuit, 2013)