United States v. Bloom
4 M.J. 794, 1978 CMR LEXIS 776
U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review·Decided January 24, 1978·No. NCM 77 1795·Published·Cited by 4 cases
Opinions
We have examined the record of trial, the assignment of error, and the Government’s [795] reply thereto and have concluded that the findings and sentence are correct in law and fact and that no error materially prejudicial to the substantial rights of the appellant was committed. Accordingly, the findings and sentence as approved on review below are affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Bloom, 4 M.J. 794, 1978 CMR LEXIS 776 (usnmcmilrev 1978).
4 M.J. 794 (United States v. Bloom) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
United States v. Connell
9 M.J. 758 (U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review, 1980)
United States v. Alvarez
5 M.J. 756 (U.S. Army Court of Military Review, 1978)
United States v. Jacox
5 M.J. 531 (U.S. Navy-Marine Corps Court of Military Review, 1978)