United States v. Blanks

389 F. App'x 317
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided July 30, 2010·No. No. 10-6249·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Gregory Blanks appeals the district court’s order denying his motion to compel the Government to file a Fed.R.Crim.P. 35 motion on his behalf, or for a sentence reduction based upon his allegedly substantial assistance. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Blanks, No. 7:04-cr-00076-FL-l (E.D.N.C. Dec. 29, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Blanks, 389 F. App'x 317 (4th Cir. 2010).

389 F. App'x 317 (United States v. Blanks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.