United States v. Blanks

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6249

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

GREGORY BLANKS,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at New Bern. Louise W. Flanagan, Chief District Judge. (7:04-cr-00076-FL-1)

Submitted: July 22, 2010 Decided: July 30, 2010

Before NIEMEYER, GREGORY, and SHEDD, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gregory Blanks, Appellant Pro Se. Michael Gordon James, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Gregory Blanks appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion to compel the Government to file a Fed. R.

Crim. P. 35 motion on his behalf, or for a sentence reduction

based upon his allegedly substantial assistance. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm the district court’s order. United States v. Blanks,

No. 7:04-cr-00076-FL-1 (E.D.N.C. Dec. 29, 2009). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED