United States v. Blakeney
This text of United States v. Blakeney (United States v. Blakeney) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-7161
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
DUNDRIELLE LEFRANK BLAKENEY,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Charlotte. Graham C. Mullen, Senior District Judge. (3:02-cr-00140-GCM-1)
Submitted: October 15, 2009 Decided: October 21, 2009
Before SHEDD, DUNCAN, and AGEE, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Reita Pauline Pendry, Charlotte, North Carolina, for Appellant. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Dundrielle Lefrank Blakeney appeals the district
court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006) motion
for a reduced sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated
by the district court. United States v. Blakeney, No.
3:02-cr-00140-GCM-1 (W.D.N.C. June 9, 2009). We dispense with
oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Blakeney, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-blakeney-ca4-2009.