United States v. Blake, Ronald E.

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Blake, Ronald E.. Read the opinion of the Court — 146 F. App'x 851
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·Decided June 28, 2007·No. 06-3390·Unpublished

Opinion

NONPRECEDENTIAL DISPOSITION To be cited only in accordance with Fed. R. App. P. 32.1

United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit Chicago, Illinois 60604

Submitted June 11, 2007 Decided June 28, 2007

Before

Hon. WILLIAM J. BAUER, Circuit Judge

Hon. ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge

Hon. ANN CLAIRE WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge

No. 06-3390

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Appeal from the United States Plaintiff-Appellee, District Court for the Southern District of Illinois. v. No. 02 CR 30086 RONALD E. BLAKE, Defendant-Appellant. G. Patrick Murphy, Chief Judge.

ORDER

The defendant-appellant was not given his right of allocution after the case was remanded for resentencing. The government agrees that the judge made a mistake but says that it was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt. We are less sure of that proposition.

Accordingly, the case is remanded again for resentencing and this time the defendant-appellant must be accorded his allocution rights.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Blake, Ronald E., (7th Cir. 2007).

United States v. Blake, Ronald E. (United States v. Blake, Ronald E.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.