United States v. Blake Knievel

Eighth Circuit

United States v. Blake Knievel

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedFebruary 14, 2025

Docket24-3357

StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Blake Knievel (United States v. Blake Knievel) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Blake Knievel, (8th Cir. 2025).

Pincite

Opinion

United States Court of Appeals For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________

No. 24-3357 ___________________________

United States of America

lllllllllllllllllllllPlaintiff - Appellee

v.

Blake M. Knievel

lllllllllllllllllllllDefendant - Appellant ____________

Appeal from United States District Court for the District of Nebraska - Omaha ____________

Submitted: February 11, 2025 Filed: February 14, 2025 [Unpublished] ____________

Before LOKEN, BENTON, and ERICKSON, Circuit Judges. ____________

PER CURIAM.

Blake Knievel appeals the district court’s1 denial of his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(1)(A)(i). Upon careful review, we conclude that

1 The Honorable Robert F. Rossiter, Jr., Chief Judge, United States District Court for the District of Nebraska. the court did not err in finding that Knievel failed to establish extraordinary and compelling reasons warranting a sentence reduction. See United States v. Marcussen, 15 F.4th 855, 858 (8th Cir. 2021).

Accordingly, we grant counsel’s motion to withdraw and affirm. ______________________________

-2-

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI