United States v. Blagrove

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7716

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff – Appellee,

v.

ANTHONY A. BLAGROVE, a/k/a Tony,

Defendant – Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Norfolk. Robert G. Doumar, Senior District Judge. (2:95-cr-00052-RGD-1)

Submitted: January 19, 2010 Decided: January 27, 2010

Before NIEMEYER, KING, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Anthony A. Blagrove, Appellant Pro Se. William David Muhr, Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Anthony A. Blagrove appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18

U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. United States v.

Blagrove, No. 2:95-cr-00052-RGD-1 (E.D. Va. Aug. 24, 2009). We

further deny Blagrove’s motion for documents in his brother’s

district court case. We dispense with oral argument because the

facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED