United States v. Bladimir Devila, Avery Lightborne

Eleventh Circuit

United States v. Bladimir Devila, Avery Lightborne

242 F.3d 995

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit

DecidedMarch 5, 2001

Docket98-4374

StatusPublished

Cited by7 cases

This text of 242 F.3d 995 (United States v. Bladimir Devila, Avery Lightborne) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

United States v. Bladimir Devila, Avery Lightborne, 242 F.3d 995 (11th Cir. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

BY THE COURT:

The Court DISMISSES the appeal as to Appellant Rauldino Rivera upon the sug- *996 gestión of death filed by his counsel. The Court VACATES the judgment of conviction below as to Appellant Rivera, and REMANDS Appellant Rivera’s case to the District Court with instructions to dismiss the indictment against him. See U.S. v. Schumann, 861 F.2d 1234 (11th Cir.1988). On its own motion, the Court VACATES its June 27, 2000, opinion as to Appellant Rivera. The appeals of the remaining Appellants shall be unaffected by this order.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

BY THE COURT:

The Court DISMISSES the appeal as to Appellant Rauldino Rivera upon the sug- *996 gestión of death filed by his counsel. The Court VACATES the judgment of conviction below as to Appellant Rivera, and REMANDS Appellant Rivera’s case to the District Court with instructions to dismiss the indictment against him. See U.S. v. Schumann, 861 F.2d 1234 (11th Cir.1988). On its own motion, the Court VACATES its June 27, 2000, opinion as to Appellant Rivera. The appeals of the remaining Appellants shall be unaffected by this order.

United States v. Ruben Campa, A.K.A. John Doe 3, A.K.A. Vicky, A.K.A. Camilo, A.K.A. Oscar, Rene Gonzalez, A.K.A. Iselin, A.K.A. Castor, Gerardo Hernandez, A.K.A. Giro, A.K.A. Manuel Viramontez, A.K.A. John Doe 1, A.K.A. Manuel Viramontes, Luis Medina, A.K.A. Oso, A.K.A. Johnny, A.K.A. Allan, A.K.A. John Doe 2, Antonio Guerrero, A.K.A. Rolando Gonzalez-Diaz, A.K.A. Lorient, United States of America v. Gerardo Hernandez, A.K.A. Giro, A.K.A. Manuel Viramontez, A.K.A. John Doe 1, A.K.A. Manuel Viramontes, Luis Medina, A.K.A. Oso, A.K.A. Johnny, A.K.A. Allan, A.K.A. John Doe 2, Rene Gonzalez, A.K.A. Iselin, A.K.A. Castor, Antonio Guerrero, A.K.A. Rolando Gonzalez-Diaz, A.K.A. Lorient, Ruben Campa, A.K.A. John Doe 3, A.K.A. Vicky, A.K.A. Camilo, A.K.A. Oscar

459 F.3d 1121 (Eleventh Circuit, 2006)

United States v. Campa

529 F.3d 980 (Eleventh Circuit, 2005)

United States v. Pedro Luis Christopher Tinoco

304 F.3d 1088 (Eleventh Circuit, 2002)

United States v. Michael Andrew Smith, AKA the Bird

282 F.3d 758 (Ninth Circuit, 2002)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

242 F.3d 995, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-bladimir-devila-avery-lightborne-ca11-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack