United States v. Blackmon

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Blackmon. Read the opinion of the Court — 490 F. App'x 574
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 24, 2010·No. 09-6577·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6577

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

FREDDIE BLACKMON, JR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of North Carolina, at Statesville. Richard L. Voorhees, District Judge. (5:02-cr-00034-RLV-7)

Submitted: May 20, 2010 Decided: May 24, 2010

Before WILKINSON, NIEMEYER, and DAVIS, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Freddie Blackmon, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. Amy Elizabeth Ray, Assistant United States Attorney, Asheville, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Freddie Blackmon, Jr., appeals the district court’s

order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006) motion. We have

reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly,

we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United

States v. Blackmon, No. 5:02-cr-00034-RLV-7 (W.D.N.C. Feb. 26,

2009). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials

before the court and argument would not aid the decisional

process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Blackmon, (4th Cir. 2010).

United States v. Blackmon (United States v. Blackmon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related