United States v. Billups

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 8, 2009·No. 08-7613·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7613

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

GREGORY L. BILLUPS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Richmond. Richard L. Williams, Senior District Judge. (3:05-cr-00042-RLW-1)

Submitted: March 23, 2009 Decided: June 8, 2009

Before WILKINSON, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gregory L. Billups, Appellant Pro Se. Richard Daniel Cooke, Brian Ronald Hood, Assistant United States Attorneys, Richmond, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Gregory L. Billups appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18

U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court. United States v. Billups, No.

3:05-cr-00042-RLW-1 (E.D. Va. Aug. 1, 2008). We dispense with

oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Billups, (4th Cir. 2009).

United States v. Billups (United States v. Billups) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related