United States v. Billingsley

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedMarch 9, 2009
Docket08-8609
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Billingsley (United States v. Billingsley) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Billingsley, (4th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-8609

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

KEITH BILLINGSLEY,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia, at Alexandria. James C. Cacheris, Senior District Judge. (1:03-cr-00395-JCC-3)

Submitted: February 26, 2009 Decided: March 9, 2009

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Keith Billingsley, Appellant Pro Se. Jonathan Leo Fahey, Assistant United States Attorney, Alexandria, Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Keith Billingsley appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18

U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and

find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

reasons stated by the district court. United States v.

Billingsley, No. 1:03-cr-00395-JCC-3 (E.D. Va., Dec. 2, 2008).

We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the

court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Billingsley, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-billingsley-ca4-2009.