United States v. Bibbs

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Bibbs

478 F. App'x 753

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 2, 2012·No. No. 12-6560·Published

Opinion

[754] Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Charles Benjamin Bibbs, III, appeals the district court’s order granting his motion for modification of sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Bibbs, No. 4:05-cr-00032-AWA-FBS-l (E.D.Va. Mar. 14, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

[754] Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Charles Benjamin Bibbs, III, appeals the district court’s order granting his motion for modification of sentence, 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Bibbs, No. 4:05-cr-00032-AWA-FBS-l (E.D.Va. Mar. 14, 2012). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Bibbs, 478 F. App'x 753 (4th Cir. 2012).

Pincite

478 F. App'x 753 (United States v. Bibbs) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related