United States v. Berry

631 F. App'x 135
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJanuary 20, 2016
DocketNo. 15-7350
StatusPublished

This text of 631 F. App'x 135 (United States v. Berry) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Berry, 631 F. App'x 135 (4th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Jermaine Monte Berry appeals from the. district court’s order denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2012) motion for reduction of sentence based on Amendment 782 to the Sentencing Guidelines. Application of Amendment 782 to Berry does not have the effect of lowering his Guidelines sentence. Accordingly, he is not entitled to a sentence reduction under § 3582(c)(2). Because the district court did not err in .denying Berry’s motion, we affirm. We deny Berry’s motion for appointment of counsel. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before this court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
631 F. App'x 135, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-berry-ca4-2016.