United States v. Benton

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Benton. Read the opinion of the Court — 523 F.3d 424
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 5, 2009·No. 08-7142·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-7142

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

ROBERT BENTON, JR.,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Florence. Cameron McGowan Currie, District Judge. (4:97-cr-00866-CMC-1)

Submitted: February 26, 2009 Decided: March 5, 2009

Before NIEMEYER, MICHAEL, and GREGORY, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Robert Benton, Jr., Appellant Pro Se. William E. Day, II, Assistant United States Attorney, Florence, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Robert Benton, Jr., appeals the district court’s order

denying his motion filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2)

(2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. United States v. Benton, No. 4:97-cr-00866-CMC-

1 (D.S.C. June 12, 2008). We dispense with oral argument

because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented

in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Benton, (4th Cir. 2009).

United States v. Benton (United States v. Benton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related