United States v. Benson

39 F. App'x 947
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Benson. Read the opinion of the Court — 69 F. App'x 197
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided August 2, 2002·No. 02-6826·Unpublished

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Carvel E. Benson appeals the district court’s order denying his motion filed pursuant to 18 U.S.C.A. § 3582(c)(2) (West 2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Benson, No. CA-89-136-2 *948 (E.D.Va. Apr. 24, 2002). Benson’s motion for appointment of counsel is denied. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.'

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Benson, 39 F. App'x 947 (4th Cir. 2002).

39 F. App'x 947 (United States v. Benson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related