United States v. Bennett

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Bennett

319 F. App'x 262

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 24, 2009·No. 08-8553·Unpublished

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Carl Edward Bennett appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Bennett, No. 0:04-cr-00657-JFA-2 (D.S.C. Nov. 21, 2008). We dispense with oral argument as the facts and legal contentions are adequately addressed in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Carl Edward Bennett appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See United States v. Bennett, No. 0:04-cr-00657-JFA-2 (D.S.C. Nov. 21, 2008). We dispense with oral argument as the facts and legal contentions are adequately addressed in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Bennett, 319 F. App'x 262 (4th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

319 F. App'x 262 (United States v. Bennett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related