United States v. Bennett

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 02-6578

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

GEORGE BENNETT,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Middle District of North Carolina, at Winston-Salem. William L. Osteen, District Judge. (CR-94-189)

Submitted: July 25, 2002 Decided: August 5, 2002

Before WILKINS, MOTZ, and TRAXLER, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

George Bennett, Appellant Pro Se. Benjamin H. White, Jr., OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Greensboro, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

George Bennett appeals the district court’s order denying his

motion to reduce his sentence under 18 U.S.C.A. § 3582(c)(2) (West

2000). We have reviewed the record and the district court’s opinion

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the

reasoning of the district court. See United States v. Bennett, No.

CR-94-189 (M.D.N.C. Mar. 27, 2002). We deny Bennett’s motion to

proceed in forma pauperis and dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED