United States v. Benally
560 F.3d 1151, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 6170, 2009 WL 738393
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit·Decided March 23, 2009·No. 08-4009·Published·Cited by 3 cases
Opinions
ORDER
This matter is before the court on Kerry Dean Benally’s petition for rehearing en banc. The original panel considered the petition. Any implicit request for panel rehearing is denied.
The en banc request was transmitted to all of the judges of the court who are in regular active service. A poll was called and a majority of the active judges voted to deny rehearing en banc. Chief Judge Henry, Judge Briscoe, Judge Lucero, and Judge Murphy would grant the petition.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Benally, 560 F.3d 1151, 2009 U.S. App. LEXIS 6170, 2009 WL 738393 (10th Cir. 2009).
560 F.3d 1151 (United States v. Benally) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
People v. Pena-Rodriguez
412 P.3d 461 (Colorado Court of Appeals, 2012)
United States v. Benally
415 F. App'x 86 (Tenth Circuit, 2011)