United States v. Belle

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedAugust 4, 2009
Docket09-6129
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Belle (United States v. Belle) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Belle, (4th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-6129

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

DARIUS BELLE, a/k/a Dee,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Columbia. Joseph F. Anderson, Jr., Chief District Judge. (3:06-cr-00748-JFA)

Submitted: July 30, 2009 Decided: August 4, 2009

Before MOTZ, KING, and DUNCAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Darius Belle, Appellant Pro Se. Robert Frank Daley, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Columbia, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Darius Belle appeals the district court’s order

denying his 18 U.S.C. § 3582 (2006) motion for reduction of

sentence. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible

error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the

district court. United States v. Belle, No. 3:06-cr-00748-JFA

(D.S.C. Jan. 15, 2009). We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Belle, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-belle-ca4-2009.