United States v. Bell

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 01-20125 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

ANTHONY WAYNE BELL,

Defendant-Appellant.

-------------------- Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-00-CR-193-1 -------------------- February 21, 2002

Before JOLLY, JONES, and BENAVIDES, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Anthony Wayne Bell appeals his guilty-plea conviction for

being a felon in possession of a firearm possessed in and

affecting interstate commerce, in violation of 18 U.S.C.

§§ 922(g)(1) and 924(a)(2). He contends that the factual basis

was insufficient to support the interstate commerce element of an

18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) offense and that this court should

reconsider its jurisprudence regarding the constitutionality of

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 01-20125 -2-

18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) in the light of Jones v. United States, 529

U.S. 848 (2000), and United States v. Morrison, 529 U.S. 598

(2000).

“This court has repeatedly emphasized that the

constitutionality of § 922(g)(1) is not open to question.” See

United States v. De Leon, 170 F.3d 494, 499 (5th Cir.), cert.

denied, 528 U.S. 863 (1999); United States v. Daugherty, 264 F.3d

513, 518 (5th Cir. 2001). The judgment of the district court is

AFFIRMED.