United States v. Bell

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
DecidedFebruary 16, 2000
Docket99-20011
StatusUnpublished

This text of United States v. Bell (United States v. Bell) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
United States v. Bell, (5th Cir. 2000).

Opinion

No. 99-20011 -1-

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

No. 99-20011 Conference Calendar

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff-Appellee,

versus

DANNY WAYNE BELL,

Defendant-Appellant.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-98-CR-266-1 - - - - - - - - - - February 16, 2000

Before EMILIO M. GARZA, BENAVIDES, and DENNIS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Danny Wayne Bell seeks to appeal his sentence of 46 months’

imprisonment after pleading guilty to being a felon in possession

of a firearm. Bell waived his right to appeal his sentence in

his plea agreement, except in limited circumstances. See United

States v. Melancon, 972 F.2d 566, 568 (5th Cir. 1992). Such

circumstances are not implicated by the current appeal. Bell’s

reliance on United States v. Goodman, 165 F.3d 169 (2nd Cir.),

cert. denied, 120 S. Ct. 318 (1999) is unavailing because Goodman

is not controlling and is distinguishable.

* Pursuant to 5TH CIR. R. 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in 5TH CIR. R. 47.5.4. No. 99-20011 -2-

The appeal is thus DISMISSED.

APPEAL DISMISSED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

United States v. Brian Melancon
972 F.2d 566 (Fifth Circuit, 1992)
United States v. Kimberly Goodman
165 F.3d 169 (Second Circuit, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
United States v. Bell, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-bell-ca5-2000.