United States v. Begay

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Begay. Read the opinion of the Court — 673 F.3d 1038 →

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided January 4, 2010·No. 07-10487·Published

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  Plaintiff-Appellee, No. 07-10487 v.  D.C. No. CR-06-00626-DGC KENDERICK BEGAY, a.k.a. Kendrick Begay, ORDER Defendant-Appellant.  Filed January 4, 2010

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

Upon the vote of a majority of nonrecused active judges, it is ordered that this case be reheard en banc pursuant to Circuit Rule 35-3. The three-judge panel opinion shall not be cited as precedent by or to any court of the Ninth Circuit.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  Plaintiff-Appellee, No. 07-10487 v.  D.C. No. CR-06-00626-DGC KENDERICK BEGAY, a.k.a. Kendrick Begay, ORDER Defendant-Appellant.  Filed January 4, 2010

ORDER

KOZINSKI, Chief Judge:

United States v. Begay, (9th Cir. 2010).

Pincite

United States v. Begay (United States v. Begay) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.