United States v. Beeks

• Court: Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
• Decided: August 13, 2004
• Docket: 04-6755
• Status: Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 04-6755

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

versus

DAVID LAMONT BEEKS,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South Carolina, at Greenville. Henry M. Herlong, Jr., District Judge. (CR-01-828; CA-04-450-6-20)

Submitted: July 21, 2004 Decided: August 13, 2004

Before WIDENER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

David Lamont Beeks, Appellant Pro Se. Regan Alexandra Pendleton, Assistant United States Attorney, Greenville, South Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. See Local Rule 36(c). PER CURIAM:

David Lamont Beeks seeks to appeal the district court’s

order summarily dismissing his motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255

(2000). We have independently reviewed the record and conclude

that Beeks has not made a substantial showing of the denial of a

constitutional right. See Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 336

(2003). Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and

dismiss the appeal. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c) (2000). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument

would not aid the decisional process.

DISMISSED

- 2 -