United States v. Becks

Fourth Circuit

United States v. Becks

325 F. App'x 251

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided May 28, 2009·No. No. 09-6060·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Jeffrey Ezekiel Becks appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See United States v. Hood, 556 F.3d 226, 232-33 (4th Cir.2009). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Becks, No. 3:04-cr-00250-RJC-CH-10, 2008 WL 5236030 (W.D.N.C. Dec. 15, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Jeffrey Ezekiel Becks appeals the district court’s order denying his motion for a reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. See United States v. Hood, 556 F.3d 226, 232-33 (4th Cir.2009). Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Becks, No. 3:04-cr-00250-RJC-CH-10, 2008 WL 5236030 (W.D.N.C. Dec. 15, 2008). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

United States v. Becks, 325 F. App'x 251 (4th Cir. 2009).

Pincite

325 F. App'x 251 (United States v. Becks) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related