United States v. Beatty

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 4, 2010·No. 09-7114·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 09-7114

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

GIDEON R. BEATTY, IV, a/k/a Bert, a/k/a Kev,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, District Judge. (1:07-cr-00066-IMK-JSK-5)

Submitted: June 1, 2010 Decided: June 4, 2010

Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Gideon R. Beatty, IV, Appellant Pro Se. Zelda Elizabeth Wesley, Assistant United States Attorney, Clarksburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Gideon R. Beatty, IV, appeals the district court’s

order denying his motion for a reduction in sentence under 18

U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons

stated by the district court. United States v. Beatty, No.

1:07-cr-00066-IMK-JSK-5 (N.D.W. Va. May 19, 2009). We dispense

with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are

adequately presented in the materials before the court and

argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Beatty, (4th Cir. 2010).

United States v. Beatty (United States v. Beatty) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related