United States v. Beatty
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 09-7114
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
Plaintiff - Appellee,
v.
GIDEON R. BEATTY, IV, a/k/a Bert, a/k/a Kev,
Defendant - Appellant.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of West Virginia, at Clarksburg. Irene M. Keeley, District Judge. (1:07-cr-00066-IMK-JSK-5)
Submitted: June 1, 2010 Decided: June 4, 2010
Before GREGORY, SHEDD, and KEENAN, Circuit Judges.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Gideon R. Beatty, IV, Appellant Pro Se. Zelda Elizabeth Wesley, Assistant United States Attorney, Clarksburg, West Virginia, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Gideon R. Beatty, IV, appeals the district court’s
order denying his motion for a reduction in sentence under 18
U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find
no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons
stated by the district court. United States v. Beatty, No.
1:07-cr-00066-IMK-JSK-5 (N.D.W. Va. May 19, 2009). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
United States v. Beatty (United States v. Beatty) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.