United States v. Barrios
This text of United States v. Barrios (United States v. Barrios) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Case: 24-20262 Document: 70-1 Page: 1 Date Filed: 05/15/2025
United States Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit ____________ United States Court of Appeals Fifth Circuit
No. 24-20262 FILED Summary Calendar May 15, 2025 ____________ Lyle W. Cayce Clerk United States of America,
Plaintiff—Appellee,
versus
Oscar Barrios,
Defendant—Appellant. ______________________________
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. 4:22-CR-565-1 ______________________________
Before Higginbotham, Jones, and Oldham, Circuit Judges. Per Curiam: * Oscar Barrios pleaded guilty to three counts of distribution, receipt, and possession of child pornography. He now appeals his convictions and sentences on the receipt and possession counts, arguing for the first time that his convictions and sentences for both possession of child pornography and receipt of child pornography violate the Double Jeopardy Clause of the Fifth
_____________________ * This opinion is not designated for publication. See 5th Cir. R. 47.5. Case: 24-20262 Document: 70-1 Page: 2 Date Filed: 05/15/2025
No. 24-20262
Amendment. Because Barrios did not object to the indictment in the district court, “we review only the validity of his sentences, not his convictions.” United States v. Barton, 879 F.3d 595, 599 (5th Cir. 2018). Reviewing the unpreserved argument for plain error in light of the record as a whole, Barrios cannot show the district court committed clear or obvious error due to the lack of binding authority as to the issue whether possession of child pornography is a lesser-included offense of receipt of child pornography. See United States v. Evans, 587 F.3d 667, 671 (5th Cir. 2009); United States v. Gonzalez, 792 F.3d 534, 538 (5th Cir. 2015). Accordingly, the judgment of the district court is AFFIRMED.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
United States v. Barrios, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-barrios-ca5-2025.