United States v. Barrett

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 28, 2010·No. 10-6610·Unpublished

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 10-6610

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

Plaintiff - Appellee,

v.

WILLIE BARRETT,

Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Greenville. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (4:04-cr-00087-H-3)

Submitted: June 17, 2010 Decided: June 28, 2010

Before MOTZ and KING, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Willie Barrett, Appellant Pro Se. Kimberly Ann Moore, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Willie Barrett appeals the district court’s order

granting his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18

U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find

no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm. United States v.

Barrett, No. 4:04-cr-00087-H-3 (E.D.N.C. Apr. 12, 2010); see

United States v. Dunphy, 551 F.3d 247 (4th Cir. 2009). We deny

Barrett’s motion to appoint counsel and his motion for

production of documents. We dispense with oral argument because

the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the

materials before the court and argument would not aid the

decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Barrett, (4th Cir. 2010).

United States v. Barrett (United States v. Barrett) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Dunphy
551 F.3d 247 (Fourth Circuit, 2009)