United States v. Barrett
71 M.J. 335, 2012 CAAF LEXIS 685
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces
DecidedJune 14, 2012
DocketNo. 12-0474/NA
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases
This text of 71 M.J. 335 (United States v. Barrett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
United States v. Barrett, 71 M.J. 335, 2012 CAAF LEXIS 685 (Ark. 2012).
Opinion
CCA 201000330. Review granted on the following issue:
WHETHER CONTESTED ARTICLE 134 CLAUSE 1 OR 2 SPECIFICATIONS THAT FAIL TO EXPRESSLY ALLEGE AN ARTICLE 134 TERMINAL ELEMENT BUT THAT WERE NOT CHALLENGED AT TRIAL STATE AN OFFENSE.
No briefs will be filed under Rule 25.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
United States v. Barrett
71 M.J. 358 (Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 2012)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
71 M.J. 335, 2012 CAAF LEXIS 685, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-barrett-armfor-2012.