United States v. Barnett
71 M.J. 158, 2012 CAAF LEXIS 176
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Armed Forces
DecidedFebruary 15, 2012
DocketNo. 12-0251/AF
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases
This text of 71 M.J. 158 (United States v. Barnett) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
United States v. Barnett, 71 M.J. 158, 2012 CAAF LEXIS 176 (Ark. 2012).
Opinion
CCA 37578. Review granted on the following issue:
WHETHER THE MILITARY JUDGE ABUSED HIS DISCRETION WHEN HE INFORMED THE MEMBERS OF APPELLANT’S ILLEGAL PRETRIAL PUNISHMENT CREDIT AND THEN FAILED TO INSTRUCT THE MEMBERS BASED ON A SUBMITTED QUESTION THAT THEY WERE NOT ALLOWED TO NULLIFY SOME OR ALL OF THAT CREDIT BY INCREASING THE SENTENCE.
Briefs will be filed under Rule 25.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
United States v. Barnett
Court of Appeals for the Armed Forces, 2012
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
71 M.J. 158, 2012 CAAF LEXIS 176, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/united-states-v-barnett-armfor-2012.