United States v. Barber

473 F. App'x 187
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Barber. Read the opinion of the Court — 396 F. App'x 49
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided June 5, 2012·No. No. 11-7645·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Norwood Wallace Barber, Jr., appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his motion for reduction of sentence pursuant to 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. United States v. Barber, No. 5:05-cr-00015-SGW-RSB-1 (W.D.Va. filed Nov. 3 & entered Nov. 7, 2011). We further deny Barber’s motion for disposition hearing. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Barber, 473 F. App'x 187 (4th Cir. 2012).

473 F. App'x 187 (United States v. Barber) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related