United States v. Baptiste

450 F. App'x 311
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in United States v. Baptiste. Read the opinion of the Court — 596 F.3d 214
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided October 18, 2011·No. No. 11-7077·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Harry Ramone Baptiste appeals a district court order denying his motion for a sentence reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c) (2006). We affirm. Because the amendment in question did not lower Baptiste’s Guidelines sentence, we find the district did not abuse its discretion denying the motion. United States v. Goines, 357 F.3d 469, 478 (4th Cir.2004) (stating standard of review). Accordingly, we af[312]*312firm the district court's order. We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

United States v. Baptiste, 450 F. App'x 311 (4th Cir. 2011).

450 F. App'x 311 (United States v. Baptiste) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Anthony Goines
357 F.3d 469 (Fourth Circuit, 2004)